I dont know whether he should be allowed to remain in Malaysia. This Apek has written a lot of books to discredit Malaysia. He earns a living by writing books , to condem and discredit Malaysia in what ever manner possible. He is the Malaysian Chinese Salman Rushdie of Satanic Verses.
He is a director of SUARAM. He is a good example of a Chinese extremist but is still allowed by this good government to remain in Malaysia.
He claimed that the current government is one of the most corrupted government and would even resort to murder just to cover its fault(s).
He wrote many books and one of the latest is " Questioning Arms Spending in Malaysia".
In this book , he devoted pages upon pages of his self created theories and made many assumptions based upon newspaper resports (local and foreign), statutory declaration , etc.
Chapter 3 was entitled - Altantuya and the Scorpene Deal.
He alleged in this chapter that , there was a company , Malaysian company which receives million of dollars in kickbacks for two submarines purchased from France. Then there was this link to Altantuya and her muder in Malaysia.
The fact that he did not mentioned his sources to support his allegations was something very strange.
I look at his endnotes and there were no proof of anything that he alleged in his book. In his endnotes for Chapter 3, he refered to among other stuff ;
a] Far Eastern Economic Review Magazine article.
b] The Asia Sentinel.
c] Malaysian Parliment Hansard
d] The Star (Online)
e] The Sun
f] Asia Times
g] Balasubramaniam Statutory Declaration
This Ah Kua, writes his most important Chapter supposedly to proof that our Prime Minister is link to the murder of Altantuya by quoting newspaper reports, online media and SD...The way he writes is as though God spoke to him and he has all the evidences with him.
In that Chapter 3, he quoted Balasubramaniam SD. This Balasubramaniam drama was designed and planned by Anwar Ibrahim as revealed by Zulkifli Zainordin (Kulim MP). Bala was supposed to appear and disappear and then re-appear as well as the drama of changing lawyers and diasappearing with his family to re-appear back to inform us that he was given 5 million. Than Bala was featured (strangely ) in RPK interview via RPK web-blog. All this sandiwara was to smear the name of our Prime Minister in the most malicious way by a group of people paid by Anwar Ibrahim. No one did solat hajat on this Politik Fitnah when Anwar did it.
So Ah Kua , unaware that all this was a big drama by Mr Y - Anwar Ibrahim the Liar, jump in the band wagon and wrote a book full of lies just to discredit our Prime Minister. Of all the malicious charges made to the Malaysian Government, the one in Chapter 3 was most malicious.
Here Ah Kua uses a defamation tactic in his writing style , whenever Razak Baginda name was mentioned, he will quickly follow up with " and he was the aide of Najib Tun Razak, the Defense Minister, our current Prime Minister", again and again. By doing this several times, he uses something we call a tautology in literature and logic.
What is a tautology ?
Tautology [from Greek , 'tauto': the same, and 'logos': word/idea] is an unnecessary or unessential (and sometimes unintentional) repetition of meaning, using different and dissimilar words that effectively say the same thing (often originally from different languages). A rhetorical tautology can also be defined as a series of statements that comprise an argument, whereby the statements are constructed in such a way that the truth of the proposition is guaranteed or that the truth of the proposition cannot be disputed by defining a term in terms of another self-referentially. Consequently, the statement conveys no useful information regardless of its length or complexity making it unfalsifiable .
Razak Baginda was the aquitted accused. By repeating the name of the accused often enough with our Prime Minister's name, he maliciously intended to form an idea that some how our Prime Minister was implicated.
The true facts about Altantuya was a love affair gone wrong. Razak Baginda was just trying to protect himself from being black mail by her. The two police officers went overboard by killing her in the pretext of relieving Razak Baginda of his problem once and for all. Razak Baginda just went beserk when she came to Malaysia. Of course-lah, who wouldnt. If Razak Baginda's wife were to know about it, Razak will be a dead meat. The fact that Razak was our PM aide doesnt mean that our PM was involved. Altantuya was pregnant when she came to Malaysia. This sounds like Michael Jackson song , Billie Jean, not my lover. She just a girl who said that I am the one but the kid is not my son. The story about the submarines commission claimed by Altantuya was a crappy story. The contract to build the Scorpenes won by DCNS International of France and Spanish ship maker Navantia. Altantuya cant neither speak French nor Spanish. Ah Kua also wrote these facts in that chapter as well. Then suddenly Altantuya was link to Sukhoi jets. Which one was it ? Submarines or Jets ?
My argument would be likewise. Saiful Bukhari was Anwar Ibrahim aide. When he was sodomised by Anwar Ibrahim (accused) why dont people believed him. Even when Anwar Ibrahim refused to give his DNA, no one ever come to the conclusion that Anwar did it ? In Altantuya's case, just because Razak was working for Najib, if Razak were to shoot a kangaroo, that means Najib was involved. What kind of logic is this.
Ah Kua was the Director of Suaram. If he was very concerned about justice in Malaysia, why dont he writes a book in defense of Saiful Bukhari, the alleged sodomy victim.
Kua Kia Soong is a liar and he on purpose with devilish intent, attempted to character assasinate our Prime Minister.
In Chapter 3 , he wrote about the attempted act by Altantuya cousin to talk about a photograph featuring Razak Baginda, Altantuya, our PM and several others. If that is true, why cant Altantuya father just give the photo to the press. The fact is that, there was just no photo at all and all these lies were planned by Anwar Ibrahim the Liar.
Now, the sex video featuring Anwar Ibrahim was declared as genuine. I suggest that Kua Kia Soong write a book about this. That is a challenge. I would suggest the tittle of his new book should be - " Questioning The Man in the Video " First Full Expose of Anwar Ibrahim Missionary Position.
"There are four ways, and only four ways, in which we have contact with the world. We are evaluated and classified by these four contacts: what we do, how we look, what we say and how we say it "