Sunday, 8 January 2012

PAS Pecat Hassan Ali....!

Lembu - Pas...budak telanjang..Hassan Ali

PAS telah menunjukkan sikap anti Islam apabila memecat salah seorang ahlinya yang lantang menentang tindakan-tindakan yang menyekatnya daripada menguatkuasakan beberapa enakmen perundangan Islam yang sepatutnya disokong oleh PAS.

Hassan Ali telah berjanji kepada pengundi-pengundi PAS di Selangor bahawa perundangan Islam akan ditegakkan di Selangor. Bermula dengan kes arak yang dijual di 7 Eleven Shah Alam oleh pekerja Islam hingga kepada menyekat dakyah Kristianisasi, penggunaan kalimah Allah dan Gereja tidak berdaftar cuba mengkristiankan orang-orang Melayu adalah bebrapa isu yang menyebabkan salah faham antara PAS dan Hassan Ali.

PAS disebabkan takut kepada kepimpinan DAP sudah buat HAJI GOSTAN (berundur) apabila mengubah perjuangan Hudud kepada negara Kebajikan yang tidak diterima oleh Hassan Ali kerana janji beliau kepada pengundi-pengundi di Selangor.

Sekarang akibat daripada terpaksa mengekalkan usaha-sama dengan DAP maka PAS sanggup memecat seorang tokoh ulung yang telah melonjakkan sokongan kepada PAS disebabkan popularitinya. Inilah sikap PAS yang sebenarnya kerana sudah termakan dakyah Anwar Ibrahim dan takut kepada DAP.

Inilah yang dinamakan kepimpinan Ulama PAS....!

Bersih, PKR and Color Revolution !

The Thais had their share of trouble with Red shirts seizing control of Bangkok  and subsequently changing  the Thai’s leadership. We in Malaysia are challenged by the Yellow T Shirt - Bersih Movement that seeks for so called "Electoral reforms".
Photo: Thaksin Shinawatra, a long time servant of the global elite, since before even becoming Thailand's prime minister in 2001, reports to the CFR in New York City on the eve of the 2006 military coup that ousted him from power. He has now returned to power in Thailand via a proxy political party led by his own sister, Yingluck Shinawatra. Securing the votes of only 35% of eligible voters puts on full display how tenuous his support really is within a nation he claims stands entirely behind him.


Malaysia would also see color revolution take to their streets - this time in Malaysia by the yellow-clad, NED-funded Bersih movementThe official NED website listed four NGOs receiving funds for their operations in Malaysia. They are the IRI ($400,000), Mkini Dotcom Sdn Bhd ($100,000), NDI – National Democratic Institute for International Affairs ($322,500) and Suara Inisiatif Sdn Bhd – SUARAMA ($85,000). According to a source within PKR, the IRI infiltrated the PKR (formerly Parti Keadilan Nasional) since 1998 but its direct involvement only began after Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim was released from prison in 2004.


What is the significant of Thai’s Red Shirts and Malaysia’s Yellow Shirts ? They are part of a bigger global movement known as the “Colour Revolutions”.

Color revolutions are, without a doubt, one of the main features of global political developments today. Should the casual reader immediately wonder what a "color revolution" is, keep reading, our view here is unique, but we most certainly have some answers.

Let us first begin with the Wikipedia definition. That website introduces the concept by stating the following: 


"Color revolution(s)
 is a term used by the media to describe related [political] movements that developed in several societies in the CIS (former USSR) and Balkan states during the early 2000s. Some observers have called the events a revolutionary wave.
"Participants in the color revolutions have mostly used nonviolent resistance, also called civil resistance. Such methods as demonstrations, strikes and interventions have been [used to] protest against governments seen as corrupt and/or authoritarian, and to advocate democracy; and they have also created strong pressure for change. 

These movements all adopted a specific color or flower as their symbol. The color revolutions are notable for the important role of non-governmental organizations (NGOs) and particularly student activists in organizing creative non-violent resistance.

"These movements have been successful in Serbia (especially the Bulldozer Revolution of 2000), in Georgia's Rose Revolution (2003), in Ukraine's Orange Revolution (2004), in Lebanon's Cedar Revolution and (though more violent than the previous ones) in Kyrgyzstan's Tulip Revolution(2005), in Kuwait's Blue Revolution (2005), in Iraq's Purple Revolution (2005), and in Czechoslovakia's Velvet Revolution (1989), but failed in Iran's Green Revolution(2009–2010) . 

Each time massive street protests followed disputed elections or request of fair elections and led to the resignation or overthrow of leaders considered by their opponents to be authoritarian."

What the Wikipedia article fails to mention is the massive foreign funding, and at least any notion that color revolutions are psychosocial operations of deception.

It's a fact that Western governments (especially the US government) and various non-governmental organizations (NGOs) spend millions of dollars to co-opt and "channel" local populations of targeted countries against their own political leadership.

Empty democracy slogans and flashy colors aside, we argue that color revolutions are good old-fashioned regime change operations: destabilization without the tanks.

The secret ingredient is a sophisticated science used to manipulate emotions and circumvent critical thinking. History shows that, to much of the power elite, humanity is seen as a collection of nerve endings to be pushed and pulled one way or the other, sometimes made to tremble in fear, sometimes made to salivate like Pavlov's dogs. These days the manipulation is so pervasive, so subtle, so effective, that even critical individuals at times must necessarily fail to recognize how often--or in what context--they have fallen prey.

Of course fear is the most obvious emotion played upon to effect massive social change. One need only to reflect upon the last ten years, since 9/11, to know that fear is a primary instrument used to initiate and justify dangerous shifts in public policy.

But as humanity has been physiologically equipped with a range of emotions, and is not merely arrested and controlled by fear alone, a strata of behavioral and political science also found it useful to master the flip-side of the behavioral spectrum, and by that we mean desire, and all that drives groups of individuals to act, even in the face of fear, in pursuit of something worthwhile.

Many are the professions that utilize this type of understanding, including (but not limited to) marketing, advertising, public relations, politics and law-making, radio, television, journalism and news, film, music, general business and salesmanship; each of them selling, branding, promoting, entertaining, sloganeering, framing, explaining, creating friends and enemies, arguing likes and dislikes, setting the boundaries of good and evil: in many cases using their talents to circumvent their audiences' intellect, the real target being emotional, oftentimes even subconsciousLooking beneath the facade of the color revolutionary movement we also find a desire-based behavioral structure, in particular one that has been built upon historical lessons offered by social movements and periods of political upheaval.


It then makes sense that the personnel of such operations include perception managers, PR firms, pollsters and opinion-makers in the social media. Through the operational infrastructure, these entities work in close coordination with intelligence agents, local and foreign activists, strategists and tacticians, tax-exempt foundations, governmental agencies, and a host of non- governmental organizations. Collectively, their job is to make a palace coup (of their sponsorship) seem like a social revolution; to help fill the streets with fearless demonstrators advocating on behalf of a government of their choosing, which then legitimizes the sham governments with the authenticity of popular democracy and revolutionary fervor.

Because the operatives perform much of their craft in the open, their effectiveness is heavily predicated upon their ability to veil the influence backing them, and the long-term intentions guiding their work. 

Their effectiveness is predicated on their ability to deceive, targeting both local populations and foreign audiences with highly-misleading interpretations of the underlying causes provoking these events. And this is where we come in: to help deconstruct the deception. But we will not just cover color revolutions here, as color revolutions are bound up in the larger geopolitical universe. A color revolution isonly an instrument of foreign policy--only a tool--the ultimate object being the geopolitical advantages gained by powerful financiers and the brain trust they employ. It follows that understanding geopolitical context (and motive) is necessary to understanding the purpose of the color revolution.


Toward that end, we will discuss and analyze relationships of global power in great detail. We will highlight specific institutions of power; identify what their power rests upon; draw attention to the individuals that finance and direct their activities; speculate upon some of their motives; and get to know the broad range of tools they use to achieve them, tools which include the color revolution.

As in-depth studies into the color revolution are far too rare, and as the issue itself is far too obscure, we hope to draw more attention to it; to spark discussion and even debate.

It is an issue that takes time and patience. And it is for those that are willing to provide this time and patience that we offer all of you who visit this blog nothing but the truth.

“Never utter these words: 'I do not know this, therefore it is false.' One must study to know; know to understand; understand to judge.” . The Truth Revealed !

901 atau Lokap No 786 di Sg Buluh...





Arun will be there for 901. Dont worry !

9hb Januari 2012 adalah satu tarikh yang penting untuk Ketua Pembangkang Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim. Hari tersebut menandakan detik bersejarah sekali lagi dalam hidup beliau di mana kali ini sekali lagi penghakiman akan dijatuhkan ke atas beliau.  

Kes Liwat 2 ini berlainan sikit daripada Liwat 1 kerana kali ini, yang menuduh dengan sukarela membuat laporan polis. Tidak ada unsur-unsur dimana mangsa tidak rela di dalam membuat laporan. Tambahan  pula mangsa adalah orang yang dipilih sendiri oleh Anwar Ibrahim. Jadi bagaimana pula nak dikaitkan teori konspirasi dengan mangsa yang dipilih sendiri oleh Anwar Ibrahim ?



Perkara ini tidak akan berlaku jika Anwar Ibrahim mempunyai kriteria pemilihan di dalam memilih Personal Assistant. Seorang wakil rakyat tidak boleh memilih P.A berdasarkan rupa paras. Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim juga baru sahaja dilepaskan dari kesalahan Liwat 1 dan beliau sepatutnya berhati-hati. Jika ini dikatakan perangkap maka silapnya kenapa "pi makan umpan" kalau ikut cakap loghat Kedah. Tujuan umpan adalah untuk menangkap ikan atau tikus. Silap nya tak kan Datuk Seri tak dapat bezakan antara umpan dengan P.A.

Jika perkara ini benar-benar tidak berlaku maka saya sendiri jika dituduh akan ke Mekah dan bersumpah atas Quran di Mekah dan menafikan perkara telah berlaku. Dalam kes ini mangsa nampaknya lebih berani dari yang dituduh. Kenapa ?

Adakah ini satu sandiwara Anwar Ibrahim ? Dalam kes ini pada permulaan Anwar dikatakan ada alibi (saksi yang bersama-sama beliau semasa kejadian) tetapi sebaik sahaja kes pembelaan dikemukakan, tiada alibi yang dibawa sebagai saksi. Kenapa ?

Semua pertuduhan tidak dapat disangkal oleh pihak pembelaan sebaliknya, pihak pembelaan telah meminta Perdana Menteri dan isteri tampil ke depan sebagai saksi. Ini satu perkara yang luarbiasa. Pembelaan bahwa hal ini satu kospirasi dari segi perundaangan adalah satu pembelaan yang lemah.

Apa yang patut dilakukan oleh Karpal Singh adalah mengemukakan bukti dan keterangan bahwa semua bukti yang dibawa oleh pihak prosecution adalah tidak benar dan palsu. Bukti CCTV, air mani, DNA, keterangan kejadian , masa serta tarikh kejadian semuanya tidak disangkal oleh pihak pembelaan. Malahan Anwar Ibrahim tidak berani masuk ke dalam kandang saksi untuk memberi keterangan. Disebabkan itu beliau telah tidak disoal balas oleh pihak prosecution.
Pakar tulang belakang dibawa untuk memberi keterangan bahawa Anwar mati pucuk. Kenapa dibawa pakar sakit belakang buat pengesahan. Sepatutnya di bawa pakar sakit tuan. Kalau mati pucuk, bagaimana air mani Anwar ada dalam dubur Saiful ? 

Keterangan dibawah diambil daripada blog suarapakatanrakyat.com. Blog ini adalah blog yang menyokong Anwar Ibrahim.

Komen-komen Karpal kepada media bila ditanya mengenai kes ini juga menunjukkan yang dia sudah putus asa. Sikap ini dapat dilihat dari tindakan Karpal menyerahkan penggulungan kepada dua peguam junior iaitu Sankara Nair dan Ram Karpal secara bergilir dan tidak melakukannya sendiri sehingga akhir sepertimana sepatutnya.
Akibatnya, hujah penggulungan dilihat tidak konsisten dalam menyatakan pembelaan. Malah, kita juga amat terkejut apabila Karpal seolah-olah cuba menggambarkan yang kejadian liwat itu berlaku secara suka sama suka.
Antara hujah yang digunakan ialah Saiful punya banyak peluang untuk keluar dari bilik tidur itu sebelum dakwaan liwat itu dilakukan dan beliau memilih untuk tidak berbuat demikian. Karpal langsung tidak mempertikaikan tarikh, masa dan tempat kejadian iaitu di unit 1151 walaupun cuba menimbulkan keraguan terhadap unit tersebut sebelumnya.

Karpal juga tidak mempertikaikan dakwaan mengenai kewujudan KY Jelly dan bahawa Saiful makan karipap serta minum kopi selepas kejadian. Selain dari itu, penampilan Najwan Hilmi sebagai saksi pembelaa dan provokasi seolah-olah cuba untuk menggambarkan Saiful sebagai seorang gay hanya menguatkan lagi bahawa liwat benar-benar berlaku.
Anwar minta bantuan paderi.
Pembelaan diri yang dilakukan oleh Datuk Seri Anwar dari kandang tertuduh di mana, pastinya atas nasihat dan hujah-hujah yang disediakan Karpal juga, tidak terdapat satu pun hujah yang menerangkan bagaimana konspirasi dilakukan sehingga membolehkan DNA Anwar dijumpai di dalam dubur Saiful. Malah, nasihat Karpal untuk membiarkan bela diri dilakukan dari kandang tertuduh yang tidak boleh disoal-balas juga jelas adalah satu nasihat yang salah.
Karpal pula menyediakan hujah-hujah secara am sahaja dalam menafikan bukti saintifik yang dikemukakan pendakwa. Lebih dari itu, semua saksi pembela yang dibawa Karpal terbukti tidak punya kredibiliti dan kenyataan mereka dengan mudah boleh dipertikai dan dipatahkan oleh pendakwa.
Satu persoalan yang bermain di kalangan penyokong Datuk Seri Anwar ialah, tidak mungkin Karpal tidak terlebih dahulu menyelidik latar belakang saksi-saksi pembela yang dikemukakannya. Apakah Karpal tersilap terlalu memandang rendah terhadap pihak pendakwa dan menyangka yang mereka tidak akan mampu mendedahkan latarbelakang yang meragukan saksi-saksi yang dikemukakannya? Inikah sikap peguam yang kononnya tersohor?
Politik apa yang dimainkan Karpal sehingga memerangkap Datuk Seri Anwar?
Karpal mungkin menyangka yang hujah mengesahkan bahawa kejadian liwat berlaku secara suka sama suka akan membantu Anwar mendapat sokongan luar. Namun, sedarkah Karpal impak hujah sedemikian terhadap sokongan terhadap Anwar dari kalangan umat Islam?
Persoalan saya yang terakhir adalah , jika Pakatan Rakyat berjaya menawan Putrajaya dan selepas daripada itu Kerajaan Persekutuan telah berhadapan dengan satu senario dimana seorang menteri telah dituduh dengan salah laku seks dan pada hari hukuman dijatuhkan, menteri tersebut telah mengadakan perhimpunan besar-besaran di hadapan Mahkamah Persekutuan dan pada masa itu mungkin Anwar Ibrahim menjadi Perdana Menteri maka adakah perhimpunan tersebut akan dibenarkan ? Fikir-fikirkanlah. Sila lihat link dibawah untuk keterangan penuh kes Liwat 2.

http://hhalem.blogspot.com/2011/12/peguamcara-negara-berjaya-memaku-karpal.html

Saturday, 7 January 2012

Malaysia's Bersih & the Facade of "Clean Elections" - Must Read !


A foreign-funded movement for a foreign-serving agenda.
by Tony Cartalucci 

Bangkok, Thailand July 16, 2011 - No one would honestly suggest that cleaning 
up politics and holding any given government accountable for their actions is not 
an honorable, noble cause. It is honorable indeed, however, when such a 
movement takes to the streets but is funded by a foreign government and
 led by a servants of foreign interests it becomes obvious it has been 
hijacked in order to exploit the aspirations of a frustrated public for a self-serving 
agenda. Such a movement will ultimately fail to achieve the goals it proclaims
 to support and will give rise to corruption and tyranny the likes of which its 
followers could not imagine.

A recent example of this phenomenon is
unfolding in the streets and within the
political scene of Malaysia where a
movement calling themselves "Bersih,"
or the "Coalition for Clean and Fair Elections"
has captured the minds and imaginations of
 Malaysia's youth and progressive enclaves,
 both in Malaysia and around the world. While Bersih's leader Ambiga Sreenevasan
claims ad nauseum "we are fighting for free and fair elections," what she fails
 to share quite as often with her impressionable, well-intentioned followers
 is the fact that her movement is also funded and has received training
from the United States government and a host of foreign corporate-funded
foundations.

Ambiga receiving award from Hillary.
The Malaysian Insider reported on 
June 27, 2011 that Bersih leader Ambiga
 Sreenevassan "admitted to Bersih receiving
 some money from two US organisations —
 the National Democratic Institute (NDI) and
Open Society Institute (OSI) — for other projects,
which she stressed were unrelated to the July 9
 march." A visit to the NDI website revealed
 indeed that funding and training had been
 provided by the US organization - before NDI took down the information and
replaced it with a more benign version purged entirely of any mention of Bersih.
For funding Ambiga claims is innocuous, the NDI's rushed obfuscation of
 any ties to her organization suggests something more sinister at play.

Photo: NDI's website before taking down any mention to Malaysia's Bersih movement.
(click image to enlarge)
....
Casting further doubt on Bersih's real agenda
is the involvement of Malaysia's opposition
 front Pakatan Rakyat whose coalition
members promised to bring
in hundreds of thousands of supporters to
 take part in the July 9th, 2011 Bersih 2.0 rally.


The opposition front is led by  Anwar Ibrahim and a coalition of opposition parties
with a  long history of affiliation with Anwar.That Anwar Ibrahim himself was
Chairman of the Development Committeeof the World Bank and International
Monetary Fund (IMF) in 1998, held lecturing positions at the School
of Advanced International Studies at Johns Hopkins University,
was a consultant to the World Bank, and a panelist at the Neo-Con lined
National Endowment for Democracy's "Democracy Award" and a panelist
at a NED donation ceremony - the very same US organization funding
and supporting Bersih -casts irrefutable doubt on their official agenda for
"clean and fair elections."

Photo: Taken from the US National Endowment for Democracy's 2007 
Democracy Award event held in Washington D.C., Anwar Ibrahim can
be seen to the far left and participated as a "panelist." It is no surprise
that NED is now subsidizing his bid to worm his way back into power
 in Malaysia. (click image to enlarge)
....

In reality, Bersih's leadership along with Anwar and their host of
foreign sponsors are attempting to galvanize the very real grievances
of the Malaysian people and exploit them to propel themselves into
 power. While many may be tempted to suggest that "clean and fair
elections" truly are Bersih and Anwar's goal, and that US funding
 via NED's NDI and billionaire bankster George Soros' Open Society
 are entirely innocuous, a thorough examination of these organizations,
 how they operate, and their admitted agenda reveals the proverbial
 cliff Bersih is leading its followers and the nation of Malaysia over.

NED, NDI, IRI, & Freedom House are run by warmongering imperialists 
We begin our thorough examination of these organizations with a look at the board of directors of NEDwhich funds NDI and who, judging by their supposed mission to support "freedom around the world," should be filled with Nobel Peace Prize laureates, accomplished diplomats, and definitive examples of democracy in action. Instead, we have John Bohn who traded petrochemicals, was an international banker for 13 years with Wells Fargo, and is currently serving as a principal for a global advisory and consulting firm, GlobalNet Partners, which assists foreign businesses by making their "entry into the complex China market easy." Surely Bohn's ability to manipulate China's political landscape through NED's various activities both inside of China and along its peripheries constitutes an alarming conflict of interests. However, it appears "conflict of interests" is a reoccurring theme throughout both NED and Freedom House.

Bohn is joined by Rita DiMartino who worked for Council on Foreign Relations corporate member AT&T as "Vice President of Congressional Relations" as well as a member of the CFR herself. Also representing the Fortune 500 is Kenneth Dubersteina board member of the war profiteering Boeing Company, big oil's ConocoPhillips, and the Mack-Cali Realty Corporation. Duberstein also served as a director of Fannie Mae until 2007. He too is a CFR member as are two of the companies he chairs, Boeing and ConocoPhillips

We then consider several of the certified warmongers serving upon NED's board of directors including Francis FukuyamaZalmay KhalilzadWill Marshall, and Vin Weber, all signatories of the pro-war, pro-corporate, utterly insane Project for a New American Century. Within the pages of documents produced by this "think tank" are pleas to various US presidents to pursue war against sovereign nations, the increase of troops in nations already occupied by US forces, and what equates to a call for American global hegemony in a Hitlerian 90 page document titled "Rebuilding Americas Defenses." As we will see, this warmongering think tank serves as a nexus around which fellow disingenuous "rights advocate" Freedom House also gravitates.

The "Statement of Principles," signed off by NED chairmen Francis Fukuyama, Zalmay Khalilzad, and Vin Weber, states, "we need to accept responsibility for America's unique role in preserving and extending an international order friendly to our security, our prosperity, and our principles." Of course by "international order" they mean meddling beyond the sovereign borders of the United States and is merely used as a euphemism for global imperialism. Other Neo-Con degenerates that signed their name to this statement include Freedom House'sPaula DobrianskyDan Quayle (formally), and Donald Rumsfeld (formally), along with Paul Wolfowitz, Dick Cheney, Eliot Cohen, and Elliot Abrams.

A PNAC "Statment on Post-War Iraq" regarding a wholehearted endorsement of nation-building features the signatures of NED chairman Will Marshall, Freedom House's Frank Carlucci(2002), and James Woolsey (formally), along with Martin Indyk (Lowy Institute board member, co-author of the conspiring "Which Path to Persia?" report), and William Kristol and Robert Kagan both of the warmongering Foreign Policy Initiative. It should be noted that the Foreign Policy Initiative (FPI) is, for all intents and purposes, PNAC's latest incarnation and just recently featured an open letter to House Republicans calling on them to disregard the will of the American people and continue pursuing the war in Libya. The FPI letter even suggests that the UN resolution authorizing the war in the first place, was holding America "hostage" and that it should be exceeded in order to do more to "help the Libyan opposition."

An untitled PNAC letter addressed to then US President George Bush regarding a general call for global warmongering received the seal of approval from Freedom Houses' Ellen Bork(2007), Ken Adelman (also former lobbyist for Thailand's Thaksin Shinawatra via Edelman), and James Woolsey (formally), along with Neo-Con degenerates Richard Perle, William Kristol, Robert Kagan, and the always disingenuous demagogue Daniel Pipes.

It is safe to say that the National Endowment for Democracy is not interested in any shape, form, or way in "supporting freedom around the world," nor Malaysia's "clean and fair elections," but rather leveraging these ideals to establish an insidious, self-serving, global corporate oligarchy. Within the confines of PNAC, and its successors, the Foreign Policy Initiative and the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, these supposed "democracy and human rights advocates" have engineered and promoted the continuation of the most obscene and horrendous chapters of mass murder, invasion, occupation, and unrelenting war in recent human history.

Photo: NED's long reach: Thai protesters in Bangkok rallied at the Malaysian Embassy on behalf of Bersih protesters that were arrested preceding the July 9th rally in Kuala Lumpur. The event was covered by NED-funded Prachatai, featuring NED-funded protesters drawn from the "People's Empowerment Foundation," protesting on behalf of NED's NDI-funded Bersih movement in Malaysia.
....

In turn, NED, an organization that Malaysia's Anwar Ibrahim is an active participant in, funds a myriad of propagandists and sub-funding arms, most notably Freedom House, the International Republican Institute and the National Democratic Institute which is on record funding Malaysia's Bersih movement. Disingenuous, warmonger-infested advocacy groups like Freedom House have been relentlessly campaigning in support of Bersih. A selection of their "reports" can be read below, and seen cited by the international corporate media to bolster Bersih's non-existent legitimacy.

A selection of Freedom House's rhetorical support for Malaysia's Bersih:


The Council on Foreign Relations

The Council on Foreign Relations, a US based think tank that represents the collective interests and agenda of the Fortune 500 corporations that constitute its membership has also weighed in on Malaysia's Bersih movement, decidedly behind the foreign-funded organization and applauding the division it is creating within Malaysian society. It should be noted that the CFR praises the "fine" coverage of Bersih by Australian National University's New Mandala blog run by imposter-academic Andrew Walker. Walker in turn, has been recently caught denying his involvement with the Lowy Institute, yet another collection of fraud academics, fake journalists, and policy wonks all in the employ of the Fortune 500.

George Soros & Open Society Institute (OSI)

George Soros' Open Society Institute not only was cited by Bersih leader Ambiga Sreenevasan as having funded her opposition street-front, but is also funding a myriad of corporate agenda-serving "democracy and human rights advocacy" groups providing rhetorical support and contrived metrics cited by the corporate media to further lend Bersih legitimacy. Open Society funds NDI partner organization "Transparency International" which also receives funding from Exxon, General Electric, Shell, Pfizer, British Petroleum, HSBC Holdings, and Procter & Gamble. Soros' Open Society also funds Amnesty International (page 10) and Human Rights Watch which have both rushed to Bersih's defense before, during, and after their July 9th street rally.

Soros-funded Human Rights Watch's support for the Malaysian Bersih movement:


It should be noted that the "joint letter" was signed off by fellow Soros and Fortune 500-funded Amnesty International, as well as NED, Soros, and Tides Foundation-funded International Federation for Human Rights (FIDH).

Soros-funded Amnesty International's support for the Malaysian Bersih movement:


Conclusion

If there was any doubt in one's mind regarding the nature of the National Endowment for Democracy, George Soros' Open Society, and the myriad of contrived self-appointed international arbiters serving the globalists' agenda, who they support, and why, reading the signed confession put out by the Project for a New American Century, calling for American global hegemony should lay it to rest. Just as the British Empire and the Romans before them leveraged the concept of spreading "civilized society" to sell their aspirations of global conquest to an ignorant population, the modern Anglo-American corporate-financier oligarchy is leveraging the concepts of spreading "human rights," "democracy," and "freedom" to sell their emerging "international order." This is an order described by Neo-Con degenerate Robert Kagan as serving "the needs of the United States and its allies, which constructed it," and clearly not the liberal democratic utopia many progressive activists believe they are contributing to.

Image: The modern day imperial networks building the Anglo-American corporate-financier "international order." (click on image to enlarge)
....

Consider the insidious methods used by the Romans to pacify and conquer entire populations by "integrating" them into their own Roman "international order."



'His object was to accustom them to a life of peace and quiet by the provision of amenities. He therefore gave official assistance to the building of temples, public squares and good houses. He educated the sons of the chiefs in the liberal arts, and expressed a preference for British ability as compared to the trained skills of the Gauls. The result was that instead of loathing the Latin language they became eager to speak it effectively. In the same way, our national dress came into favour and the toga was everywhere to be seen. And so the population was gradually led into the demoralizing temptation of arcades, baths and sumptuous banquets. The unsuspecting Britons spoke of such novelties as 'civilization', when in fact they were only a feature of their enslavement.' 

Tacitus Annals of Imperial Rome, translated Michael Grant, Penguin 1956, 1975, page 72

Indeed the alleged "free and fair elections," proposed to Malaysia by the likes of NED and Freedom House to be carried out by foreign-funded Bersih, are nothing more than features of Malaysia's own enslavement. For a look into Malaysia's future, one should consider Egypt's recent turmoil - turmoil many Bersih supporters eagerly hold up as an inspiration for their current movement.

As Egyptians rallied to "free" themselves, they toppled a nationalist government and ushered in Mohammed ElBaradei, a stooge in full service of the United States via the International Crisis Group, alongside unlikely allies like the President of Israel Shimon PeresBank of Israel's Stanley Fischer, and America's geopolitical meddler Zbigniew BrzezinskiJust recently, Senator John McCain, chairman of the International Republican Institute, a NED-funded NGOon record for being behind the "Arab Spring," took with him members of various Fortune 500 corporations for a tour of newly "freed" Cairo. Their agenda is "economic liberalization" and the total integration of Egypt's once sovereign economy into the Anglo-American empire. Like the ancient British, the Egyptian youth are dazzled with their new Western trappings and their new liberal democracy, courtesy of the insidious, unseen tentacles emanating from the globalist oligarchy and led by a known agent of the West.

Malaysia faces similar crossroads and must decide for themselves if they will clean up their government themselves through pragmatism, truly independent grassroots activism, and technical solutions to solve the problems they face as a sovereign nation, or if they will follow a feckless, self-defeating political agenda manipulated and led by foreign interests, dividing and destabilizing their nation so that foreign powers can sweep into power their stooges and once again direct Malaysia's destiny for them, to the benefit of no Malaysian.